Sunday, March 2, 2008

"For the Bible Tells Me So" - or does it?

A couple nights ago I watched the documentary For the Bible Tells Me So. It was fantastic. It should be required viewing for any religious person, particularly for anyone that thinks they know what the Bible says about homosexuality. Actually, it should be required viewing for any nonreligious person, too, since it demonstrates that religious individuals, families, and groups can be supportive, accepting, and loving toward those that are homosexual.

The film focuses primarily on the experiences of a handful of deeply religious families with gay or lesbian family members. The families include that of Gene Robinson, the Episcopal bishop in New Hampshire whose ordination was highly controversial because of his homosexuality, and the family of Dick Gephardt, the former Congressman who ran for President in 2004, and whose daughter is a lesbian. Several other families are interviewed, as well. Each family has reacted differently to their situation. In a couple cases parents and other families have actually become staunch activists and LGBT supporters, even after previously holding very conservative views. In at least one case, parents remain strongly opposed to their child's homosexuality.

Several biblical scholars and clergymen are interviewed, too. These individuals discuss several biblical passages that are often used to condemn homosexuality, and demonstrate in each case that language, historical context, and culture need to be taken into consideration, and that current interpretations by religious conservatives and biblical literalists are inaccurate and ahistorical. They're not necessarily making the case that early Christians and Old Testament prophets were cool with homosexuality, but that the kind of often conclusions drawn from the Bible are simply not accurate.

A humorous but informative animated segment in the middle of the documentary was pretty neat. It covered some major scientific findings and dispelled several myths.

But the most powerful thing by far was listening to the experiences of these deeply religious families and how they were transformed.

Setting aside religious and scientific arguments about homosexuality, which are no doubt important, this is also a matter of the heart. I've been fortunate to know and befriend individuals, men and women, that happen to be homosexual. My heart tells me that these people are just as entitled as I am to expressing their love, exploring and enjoying their sexuality, and having a committed relationship, even in marriage. In a sense, the arguments for or against it fade away when you are faced with a real life person whose hopes and dreams you care about. Then it becomes a matter of compulsion, for you feel compelled to do all you can to fight for their rights and make this world a place where they are respected and understood.

Far from undermining the foundations of Western civilization, as some would have you believe, recognizing the right of LGBT individuals to love and marry would make our society stronger and more just.

For the Bible Tells Me So is a small step in the right direction, and shows that religion can and should be a force that takes us in the right direction.

3 comments:

R. Elena Tabachnick said...

"...language, historical context, and culture need to be taken into consideration."

If you want to use scripture (from any tradition) for spiritual understanding this is always necessary.

In Christian tradition, such understanding is basic to "exogesis" (informed study). Minimally, this included historical & cultural context, relations among words & grammatical details, previous references in that or other books of the text, and for Hebrew, the syllables and even letters in a word (each letter had a whole list of meanings).

Whew!

In the monastic tradition, literal meanings were the bare beginning. To use scripture for spiritual understanding first required exogesis. But the final, deepest understanding came only after that - with "reading from the heart" (lectio divina). Then the text carried the reader into a state of open listening (akin to meditation) where personal understanding could be received direct from God.

So. Simplistic biblical literacy is not only inaccurate, it destroys the spiritual power of the text.

... And of course it's a total waste to use narrowly interpreted English translations to reach behavioral conclusions. Might as well pick random words from a dictionary!

cheers, Elena

Shelby Meyerhoff said...

We must be on the same wavelength! I watched this movie over the weekend too and was thinking about posting on it. You wrote a great review here!

guojian53 said...

Elena,

"So. Simplistic biblical literacy is not only inaccurate, it destroys the spiritual power of the text."

Your point is contingent if one assumes that there is validity in the canon of scripture.

New Testament canon was selected by a group of guys in Nicaea, in the fifth century. That is a pretty long time to wait for someone to lay down what orthodox Christianity is supposed to believe.

For example, it is my understanding that the four gospels were written after the death of the four apostles who were supposed to have written them.

I am a former adherent to the Christian covenant, and now I believe that the monothesistic faiths created God in their own images, when the named the deity, and created a Socratic based theology. The theologians' assumption is that they can know and understand an infinite deity. I hold the point of view that it is impossible to know the true nature of a deity that may exist in more dimensions than we, and therefore is many more powers of infinitely greater than we.

I have come to the conclusion that the deity, who has no name, is greater, more loving, more merciful, than anyone can describe.

Blessings,

Richard