Friday, November 7, 2008

The Prop 8 backlash and the Mormon Church

By the end of the Prop 8 campaign in California, there was a growing perception that the Yes on 8 campaign was largely Mormon-funded and Mormon-led. Fair or not, this was the perception and indeed it became the so-called conventional wisdom. It is true that a substantial amount of money raised by the campaign came from Mormon donors. It is also true that the church mobilized congregations in California and, for a time, in Utah to make phone calls and volunteer for the campaign. However, there were obviously many other groups affiliated with the Yes on 8 campaign, and donors were from all different religious backgrounds. Even more obvious is that it took 52% of Californians to actually vote for Prop 8 for it to pass. Mormons couldn't pull that off on their own.

Well, Prop 8 passed, eliminating the right of gays and lesbians to marry, and there appears to be a significant backlash now against the church. How long it will last is unclear. What this means for the church is unclear. Like I said - fair or not, there is a perception that the church was instrumental in the success of Prop 8. And people are mad. Really mad.

Protests outside the Salt Lake City temple and Los Angeles temple are either planned or have occured. Police have been standing guard on the lawn of the LA temple. I've read angry blog posts asking readers to boycott Mormon-owned businesses. I've read some pretty angry stuff. And there's a particularly nasty ad showing Mormon missionaries going into a lesbian couple's home and destroying their marriage certificate.

What's not getting on the news are the quieter voices of gays and lesbians that aren't out there protesting but just expressing the pain and their sadness that their fellow Calfornians would deem their relationships to be second-class. I've tried to put some of those voices on my blog in recent days.

People inside the church are hurting, too. I have many Mormon friends that are disappointed and confused. The church they love and support chose to engage in a nasty campaign to eliminate rights.

Is the church now reaping what it's sown? Will there be public sympathy for the church and a backlash against supporters of same-sex marriage? Or will public opinion turn on Mormons? Time will tell. Emotions will certainly die down somewhat, but I suspect that there will be some long-term effects.

This whole thing sucks. It just sucks that this ever happened. I just hate to see police outside the LA temple. And I know so many goodhearted members of the church. I hate to see the way Mormons are been portrayed by some.

Unfortunately, the temple protests and boycotts and whatever else aren't going to change Mormons' hearts and minds. You have to understand that this is precisely the sort of thing that feeds into the Mormon "us vs. them" mentality and just reinforces the idea that it's Mormons up against a wicked world that doesn't heed God's counsel. Mormons sort of thrive on persecution. It's in their history and it's almost a matter of pride.

Obviously, I don't like that there are guards at the LA temple, and that there are some seriously angry people out there. The church has become something of a scapegoat. Like I said, there were other religious groups behind Prop 8, and obviously it was the California electorate that ultimately passed Prop 8.

But can you blame folks were being angry? Can you? The fact is that a Utah-based church mobilized its members to support and fund a ballot initiative in another state that took away existing civil rights. See why that might upset people?

This whole thing just sucks. Seriously. Do you think maybe someone at that big building in downtown SLC might be regretting this just a little bit right now?

On the issue of public opinion toward the church, it seems that those that would be sympathetic to the church and its new-found persecution are folks that don't like the church much to begin with (i.e., evangelical Protestants), so I don't know how much inroads the church will make there. But mainline Protestants and moderate Catholics, as well as more secular and generally well-educated liberals will be pretty turned off by the church's involvement in this. Yes, there may be of these folks that oppose same-sex marriage, but they probably don't think we should be doing things like Prop 8 to stop it. I think this is really significant. I've actually seen survey data (from Pew) that shows that mainline Protestants and the non-religious have more favorable attitudes toward Mormons than evangelicals do, and these are precisely the folks that would be turned off by the church's involvement in Prop 8. In some people's minds, the church might go from that church with that neat choir and an admirable lifestyle to that anti-gay church that helped take away gays' right to marry.

That's why I say think it will be kind of polarizing. Some people will identify with the Mormon church on this and kind of rally to their support, but I think that it will turn off a lot of people. Opposition to same-sex marriage isn't universal in the U.S., and most Americans support strong civil liberties and protections for gays and lesbians.

Finally, I think one Mormon blogger has some really spot-on points about some of the longer-term consequences for the church because of its involvement in Prop 8. It's worth a read. Though, I should mention that his second consequence is borders on the ridiculous. But his other two seem quite accurate. And it's not a positive outlook.

All in all, I'm just sad for everybody. Nobody won on Tuesday.

4 comments:

Joel Monka said...

Hey, not everyone is holding it against them- we're going to spend a fortune in Salt Lake next year, aren't we? For the second time in just a few years?

ogre said...

Joel,

Speaking as a former resident of Utah, I can tell you that Salt Lake City was majority non-Mormon 20 years ago. It's become increasingly so.

"Them"?

I've already heard--not in blogistan, but among UUs talking about GA in person--talk about finding out which hotels and restaurants and businesses are Mormon-owned in Salt Lake, and boycotting them. It's a tough economy, and convention business that comes is going to be doubly important. If it goes selectively elsewhere (not, here, meaning away from the state, but from Mormon-owned businesses), it's going to be felt.

Mykl said...

Since the church I belong to had the nerve to ask its members to go and donate their personal time and money they should be targeted for hate? So I guess I should start hating all blacks for the crime the gangs promote. Or should I hate all homosexuals for the spread of AIDS in the 80's and 90's? Maybe I hate all Germans for what Germany did to the Jews? Maybe I should hate everyone in Missouri for stealing, murdering and raping members of the early Mormon church and issues a law (Only recently repealed in the mid 80's) that allows the legal murder of Mormons? So where does it stop. Is the homosexual community really not feeling the irony of stirring up so much hate for a peaceful church and people because they see them as spreading hate? And as for the Mormon's taking away anyone's rights; it was a vote. The majority won. And the "right" you speak of is just another incident of the courts of this nation using making law instead of interpreting it.

-m-

stephen merino said...

Mykl,

I'm not condoning hatred of anybody. Please don't lump me in with some vaguely-defined group of people that now hate the church. And it's certainly easy to write off people's legitimate concerns about Prop 8 and the church's involvement by calling them hateful. It kind of sounds like that's what you're doing. Just so you know, there are plenty of active, believing Latter-day Saints that have concerns about the church's mobilization efforts and who support same-sex marriage. It's just not as simple as you present it.

For the record, though, I don't think that protests in front of temples or other Mormon sites constitute hatred. They are peaceful and legal. People are frustrated. They have every right to be.

No, Mormons didn't pass Prop 8 singlehandedly. But they definitely helped it pass. Is the attention on Mormons fair? Probably not. But it's an easy, identifiable target.

As for your last statement, that's just ridiculous to think that our courts' only job is to interpret law. What about the court's role in extending rights to women, African Americans, and mixed-race couples? Times change, society changes, norms change, and the courts help shape laws to match that reality.

Besides, in California and in Connecticut, the courts believed that they were interpreting the constitution.

Do you not think that there are any legitimate arguments for same-sex marriage? If you don't, then you will have a hard time talking or thinking about the issue rationally. I at least recognize that there are compelling arguments against same-sex marriage - I just think they're wrong.